As a small business owner, understanding the difference between independent contractors (1099 workers) and employees (W-2 workers) is not just good practice—it’s essential for staying compliant with tax law, avoiding penalties, and maintaining a healthy workplace culture.
In recent years, high-profile lawsuits and regulatory crackdowns have highlighted the serious consequences of misclassifying workers. This first article in our three-part series will help you understand the basics of worker classification and why getting it right is crucial.
At a high level, the distinction between a 1099 contractor and a W-2 employee comes down to control and independence.
1. Payroll Obligations
2. Tax Implications
3. Benefits and Protections
This is why some businesses - intentionally or not - prefer using contractors. It can be cheaper and require less administration. Misclassifying employees to cut costs can quickly backfire, however, so it’s worth digging into some examples of that and how it can be avoided.
Misclassifying a worker as an independent contractor when they meet the legal definition of an employee can expose a business to serious legal and financial risks:
In the past decade, state and federal agencies have ramped up enforcement against companies found guilty of misclassification. Several landmark cases illustrate the risks:
1. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court, 2018)
This case reshaped how California determines whether a worker is an employee or a contractor. The court adopted the “ABC Test”, which presumes a worker is an employee unless the company can prove:
A. The worker is free from the control of the hiring entity;
B. The work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
C. The worker is engaged in an independently established trade or business.
This decision led to California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which codified the ABC Test and forced companies (especially in the gig economy) to reconsider their classification practices.
2. Uber and Lyft in California (2020–2023)
Rideshare giants Uber and Lyft were sued for classifying drivers as contractors. California argued that drivers were entitled to benefits and protections afforded to employees. The companies pushed back with Proposition 22, which allowed drivers to remain classified as contractors while granting some limited benefits.
The legal battle continues, with courts weighing in on whether Prop 22 is constitutional and whether drivers are truly independent.
3. FedEx Ground Class Action Settlement (2015)
FedEx was sued by thousands of drivers who were treated as independent contractors despite being required to wear uniforms, follow routes, and use FedEx-branded trucks. The company ultimately agreed to pay $228 million to settle claims that the drivers were actually employees entitled to overtime and reimbursements.
These cases highlight how worker classification is more than a paperwork issue; it reflects the true nature of the working relationship.
Small businesses often fall into the misclassification trap unintentionally, especially when trying to scale quickly or keep costs low.
Here are a few tips to stay compliant:
Beyond legal compliance, proper worker classification builds trust, reduces liability, and protects your company from future audits or lawsuits. In today’s evolving labor landscape, clarity around roles and responsibilities is more important than ever.
Whether you're hiring your first freelancer or expanding a full-time team, taking the time to understand 1099 vs. W-2 classifications will lay the groundwork for sustainable growth and a compliant business.
Part 2 of this series covers how small businesses can utilize contractors to reduce their payroll costs, without risking trouble from the IRS.
